CHAN POON v. MAYORKAS et al
| KWAI TEI CHAN POON |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and MERRICK GARLAND |
| 1:2023cv00355 |
| April 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Special Appearance by attorney HEATHER KRYZAK on behalf of Plaintiff KWAI TEI CHAN POON ( Filing fee $ 25 receipt number ANCMDC-3558383.) (KRYZAK, HEATHER) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against MERRICK GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3551739.), filed by KWAI TEI CHAN POON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Receipt Notices)(MCKINNEY, JEREMY) Modified on 4/28/2023 to complete case caption (Bowers, Alexis). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
