ZABOROWSKI v. GOBBLE et al
CONRAD WILLIAM ZABOROWSKI |
CANDACE GOBBLE and ALAMANCE COUNTY DSS |
1:2024cv00454 |
May 30, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation: Objections to R&R due by 8/9/2024. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 8/12/2024. (cc) |
Filing 2 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 07/26/2024, that the petition (Docket Entry #1 ) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 be dismissed without prejudice to the filing through counsel of an appropriate action in the proper court, that judgment be entered dismissing the action, that the Clerk of Court be directed to notify Ms. Benz about said dismissal, and that, there being no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability not issue. (cc) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (lg) |
Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 5.00. Receipt number: 4593. (lg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CONRAD WILLIAM ZABOROWSKI. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.