PERRY et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al
| Arthur Perry and Lisa Gillespie Perry |
| CITIMORTGAGE, INC., CORINTHIAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION doing business as SOUTHBANC MORTGAGE and TRUST TITLE COMPANY doing business as TTC SETTLEMENT AND ESCROW COMPANY |
| 1:2024cv01080 |
| December 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER: Due to judicial vacancies in this district and the required priority for criminal cases, civil cases are subject to longer decision times until these vacancies are filled. This case is subject to being reassigned to a visiting judge from another district per special assignment by the Chief Judge of the Fourth Circuit. The parties should consider whether this is an appropriate case for consent jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(c). Such consent cases will not be reassigned to a visiting judge, since the Magistrate Judge will have jurisdiction to enter a dispositive order or judgment. The parties SHALL return the attached form stating whether or not they consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to the Clerk within thirty days. Issued at the direction of CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 1/27/2025. (db) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #2 Complaint, by CITIMORTGAGE, INC.. (POPLIN, ASHLEE) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to CORINTHIAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION. (State Court documents originally filed in CABARRUS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, case number 24CV005931-120, issued 11/22/2024, listed as #6 Additional Attachments.) (sh) |
| Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Petition for Removal, Summons for Corinthian. (POPLIN, ASHLEE) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by CITIMORTGAGE, INC.. (POPLIN, ASHLEE) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by CITIMORTGAGE, INC. Answer due by 1/17/2025. Signed by Lawrence H. Cunningham, Clerk of Court, on 12/23/2024. (lhc) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (sh) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CITIMORTGAGE, INC., TRUST TITLE COMPANY. (State Court documents originally filed in CABARRUS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, case number 24CV005931-120, issued 11/22/2024, listed as Exhibit 1 to #1 Petition for Removal.) (sh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded) against All Defendants, filed by LISA GILLESPIE PERRY, ARTHUR PERRY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K) (State Court documents originally filed in CABARRUS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, case number 24CV005931-120, listed as Exhibit 1 to #1 Petition for Removal.) (sh) |
| Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (sh) |
| Case REASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS. UNASSIGNED no longer assigned to the case. (sh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from CABARRUS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, case number 24CV005931-120, against Arthur Perry, Lisa Gillespie Perry ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCMDC-3981456.), filed by CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Filings)(POPLIN, ASHLEE) Modified on 12/19/2024 to include State Court information. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
