Schmoll, et al, v. Pujdak
Plaintiff: Ronald B. Schmoll and Gerlind R. Schmoll
Defendant: Kenneth J. Pujdak
Case Number: 1:2008cv00388
Filed: August 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Securities/Commodities Office
County: Buncombe
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Lacy Thornburg
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 09:1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schmoll, et al, v. Pujdak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald B. Schmoll
Represented By: Ronald Wayne Karolyi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerlind R. Schmoll
Represented By: Ronald Wayne Karolyi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth J. Pujdak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?