Shafroth v. Sigmon
Appellant: John F. Shafroth
Appellee: Wayne Sigmon
Case Number: 1:2010cv00268
Filed: November 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Polk
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order of Dismissal dated 12/6/2010. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on December 6, 2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jhg) Modified text on 12/6/2010 (jhg). (Main Document 6 replaced on 12/6/2010 with corrected PDF) (ejb). NEF Regenerated on 12/6/2010 (ejb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shafroth v. Sigmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: John F. Shafroth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Wayne Sigmon
Represented By: P. Wayne Sigmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?