Wray v. Mitchell et al
| John Lewis Wray, Jr. |
| R. David Mitchell, Beverly Perdue, Roy Cooper, Forrest Donald Bridges, Richard L. Shaffer, Sarah E. Kirby-Turner, Collin McWhirter, David Schweepee, II, John Church, Paul Ditz, Richard G. Yout, Renita W. Melton and FNU Davis |
| 1:2010cv00298 |
| December 21, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Mitchell |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 23 Motion for his Case to be Heard; denying 24 Motion for Reconsideration and denying 25 Motion Ad Testificandum and Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 and Section 2255 Cases, this Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 08/04/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
|
|
Filing
22
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 02/28/2012. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 14 First Motion to Review Case; granting 15 Second Motion to Review Case; and Pltf has 14 days from date of this Order to contest re-characterization of his complaint as a 2254 petition or to inform the Court that he would like to dismiss this suit. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/9/12. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
