Serefex Corporation v. Hickman Holdings, LP et al
Plaintiff: Serefex Corporation
Defendant: Biltmore Investments, LTD.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00255
Filed: October 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: XX, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 147 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 06/06/2012. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (ejb)
May 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER Atty Gary K. Sue shall file either a notice of general appearance for Pltf Serefex Corporation, or a statement that he does not represent Pltf in this case on or before 5 business days from entry of this Order. FURTHER O RDERED Serefex Corporation may appear in this action through counsel or may request a short extension of time within which to obtain counsel on or before 5 business days from entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/24/12. (ejb)
January 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 140 ORDER directing the Clerk to remove John Schifino and Michael Marsalese as attorneys of record. Finally, the Court directs Gary K. Sue to Show Cause in writing within five (5) days of the entry of this Order as to whether he intends to represent Plaintiff Serefex Corp. in this matter.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 1/12/2012. (pdf)
December 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER on or before 15 days from entry of this Order, parties shall address impact, if any, of Stern v. Marshall on whether this case can be transferred to the Bankruptcy Court, and whether such transfer would be discretionary or mandatory. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 12/15/11. (ejb)
November 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER denying 129 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; and denying 130 Motion for Leave to Appear Special Admission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 11/3/11. (ejb)
October 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER counsel directed to file motions for pro hac vice admission on or before 5 business days from entry of this Order; counsel shall advise the Court in writing of disposition of Serefexs Motion to Intervene in the adversary proceeding on or before 5 business days from such ruling; and Biltmore Investments, Ltd. shall notify this Court in writing on or before 2/29/12 of status of its bankruptcy proceeding. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/20/11. (ejb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Serefex Corporation v. Hickman Holdings, LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Serefex Corporation
Represented By: John A. Schifino
Represented By: Michael P. Marsalese
Represented By: Gary K. Sue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Biltmore Investments, LTD.
Represented By: Edward C. Hay, Jr.
Represented By: Thomas Scott Tufts
Represented By: Nevin A. Weiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?