Swink v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Janice S. Swink
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2011cv00266
Filed: October 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: RutherFord
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 15 Motion for Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/16/12. (ejb)
April 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order of Remand dated 4/17/12. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (nll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swink v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice S. Swink
Represented By: George C. Piemonte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?