Synovus Bank v. Okay Properties, LLC et al
Synovus Bank |
Okay Properties, LLC and William O'Donnell, Jr. |
1:2011cv00330 |
December 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Alexander |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 07/11/2013. (thh) |
Filing 32 ORDER the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal within 30 days of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 6/10/13. (ejb) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 29 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added T. William McGee, III for Synovus Bank. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/27/13. (ejb) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Leave to Present Consolidated Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission by Synovus Bank (Doc. 77 filed in case no. 1:11cv66). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/12/13. (nll) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying as moot 7 Plaintiff Synovus Bank's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims and 8 Third Party Defendant Synovus Financial's Motion to Dismiss Third Party Claims; granting 11 Plaintiff Synovus Bank's M otion to Dismiss Amended Counterclaims; and 12 Third Party Defendant SynovusFinancial Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss Amended Third Party Claims. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS). Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 08/27/2012. (thh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.