Trent v. Roberts et al
Plaintiff: Jerry Justin Trent
Defendant: Wayne E. Johnson, The State of North Carolina, Steve E. Brooks and Richard B. Roberts
Case Number: 1:2012cv00329
Filed: October 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Transylvania
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order of Dismissal dated 5/23/2013. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER directing Plaintiff to file proof that service of process has been effected within 5 business days of entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/29/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw)
March 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying Pltf's 28 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/14/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
December 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying 2 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 3 Motion to Find the Defendant's Crimes to be Aggravated in Nature; denying 4 Motion to Judge Plaintiff Action on Merits Alone; denying 5 Motion for Leave o f Court to Depose; denying 6 Motion for Leave of Court to Depose re: Ann Wall; denying 7 Motion for Leave of Court to Depose re: Cathy Moss; denying 14 Motion to Order the Defendants to Process Plaintiff's Next Financial Instrument; denying 15 Motion to Judge Plaintiff Action on Merits Alone. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 12/11/12. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trent v. Roberts et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wayne E. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The State of North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve E. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard B. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Justin Trent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?