Stahle v. CTS Corporation
Plaintiff: Kent Stahle
Defendant: CTS Corporation
Case Number: 1:2014cv00048
Filed: February 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Asheville Office
County: Alexander
Presiding Judge: Dennis Howell
Presiding Judge: Max O. Cogburn
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/28/2017. (kby)
June 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting 55 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; added Douglas Peter Desjardins for Kent Stahle. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 6/6/2017. (kby)
June 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER re 48 MOTION for Order to Show Cause . Motion Hearing set for 6/8/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 2, 100 Otis St, Asheville, NC 28801 before Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 6/1/2017. (kby)
May 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER denying 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. In accordance with the Pretrial Order, the Ready Date for trial is 10/2/2017, and this matter will be tried on the first available trial term on or after that date unless the parties agree and jointly request a different trial date. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 5/11/2017. (kby)
October 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting 33 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; added Jane Borthwick Story for CTS Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 10/3/2016. (kby)
September 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER that the parties conduct an Initial Attorneys Conference not later than September 8, 2016 and further, the parties shall file a Certification and Report of Initial Attorneys Conference on or before September 15, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 9/1/2016. (kby)
December 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 12/04/14. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 12/04/14. (emw)
June 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that the previously imposed 9 STAY is lifted; and defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint within 14 days. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. on 6/9/14. (khm)
May 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Stay pending a ruling from the Supreme Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/8/14. (khm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stahle v. CTS Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kent Stahle
Represented By: Joseph Lafayette Anderson
Represented By: Robert Edward Dungan
Represented By: James W. Kilbourne, Jr.
Represented By: Jeffrey Kendal Stahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CTS Corporation
Represented By: E. Thomison Holman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?