Biltmore Avenue Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hanover American Insurance Company
| Biltmore Avenue Condominium Association, Inc. |
| Hanover American Insurance Company |
| 1:2015cv00043 |
| March 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Buncombe |
| Dennis Howell |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
JUDGMENT in favor of Hanover American Insurance Company against Biltmore Avenue Condominium Association, Inc. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/8/17. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying Defendant's 19 Motion for Reconsideration; granting Defendant's 19 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Hanover American Insurance Company answer due 3/9/2016. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/17/2016. (khm)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER accepting the Magistrate Judge's 14 Memorandum and Recommendations; Granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Defendant's 15 Objection to the Memorandum and Recommendation is overruled. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's breach of contract claim contained in the 7 Amended Complaint is dismissed. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/2/2016. (kby)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER denying as moot 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 8 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 4/1/2015. (nv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
