Harper v. Saul

Plaintiff: Barbara Harper
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv00212
Filed: July 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:0205
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (khm)
July 2, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Barbara Harper. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Eaglin, Paul)
July 2, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Barbara Harper. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit AC Denial of review)(Eaglin, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harper v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Harper
Represented By: Paul B. Eaglin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?