Harper v. Saul
| Barbara Harper |
| Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 1:2019cv00212 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added David F. Chermol for Barbara Harper. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/29/2019. (ejb)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Social Security Administration (SSA) served on 7/31/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (reh) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM-285s)(khm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/29/2019. (khm)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to David F. Chermol Filing fee $ 281, receipt number 0419-4110395. by Barbara Harper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certif good standing PA)(Eaglin, Paul) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Barbara Harper. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Eaglin, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Barbara Harper. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit AC Denial of review)(Eaglin, Paul) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (khm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
