Foster v. Thornburg
| Kenneth Foster |
| Lacy H. Thornburg |
| 1:2019cv00297 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 12/11/2019. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (khm) |
Filing 12
ORDER that this action is dismissed on initial review under 28 U.S.C. 1915A and 1915(e). Plaintiff's 4 Ex Parte Motion to Appoint Marshal is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's #5 Motion to Make Monthly Payments is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/11/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (khm)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER directing that correctional facility in which Plaintiff resides shall STOP deducting any additional funds from Plaintiff's Trust Account as Plaintiff has paid $350.00 filing fee in full. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ni)
|
| Filing 10 Letter to Clerk from Kenneth Foster noting that the filing fee has been paid in full and requesting that summons be issued and served. (Attachments: #1 Transaction History, #2 Envelope) (maf) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Kenneth Lee Foster with partial payment due in the amount of $90.00 and directing correctional facility to transmit payments. Signed by Clerk of Court on 11/27/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(reh)
|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement as to Kenneth Foster, submitted by Fort Dix Trust Fund Section. (Sealed - Court) (reh) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk of Court on 11/13/19. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(reh)
|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Kenneth Foster. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (khm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER of Instructions. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (khm)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of $400.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 11/12/2019. (khm) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Make Monthly Payments Towards Filing Fee by Kenneth Foster. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (khm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lacy H. Thornburg, filed by Kenneth Foster. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(khm) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/22/2019) (khm). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/22/2019: #2 Proposed Summons; #3 Cover Sheet). NEF Regenerated. (khm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Foster v. Thornburg | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lacy H. Thornburg | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth Foster | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
