Fortune v. Gaylor Electric, Inc. et al
| Darrell Jeffrey Fortune |
| Justin Baker and Gaylor Electric, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00346 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Andrew Nigh on behalf of Justin Baker, Gaylor Electric, Inc. (Nigh, Steven) |
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Justin Baker, Gaylor Electric, Inc.. (Dellinger, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Darrell Jeffrey Fortune. Replies due by 1/24/2020 (Shults, Glen) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Darrell Jeffrey Fortune. Justin Baker waiver sent on 12/27/2019, answer due 2/25/2020. (Shults, Glen) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint contained in #1 Notice of Removal, by Justin Baker.(Dellinger, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint contained in #1 Notice of Removal, by Gaylor Electric, Inc..(Dellinger, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Justin Baker, Gaylor Electric, Inc.. (Dellinger, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Justin Baker, Gaylor Electric, Inc.. Responses due by 1/17/2020 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dellinger, Stephen). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, . Justin Baker answer due 1/3/2020; Gaylor Electric, Inc. answer due 1/3/2020. Text of Order: For the reasons stated therein, the Motion is allowed and the deadline for Defendants to serve their answers or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to and including January 3, 2020. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 12/18/2019. (WCM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Justin Baker, Gaylor Electric, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dellinger, Stephen). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
| Set Deadlines: Deadline for Justin Baker and Gaylor Electric, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is 12/20/2019. (maf) |
| Case assigned to Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(thh) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Gaylor Electric, Inc. (Dellinger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen D. Dellinger on behalf of Gaylor Electric, Inc. (Dellinger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from North Carolina Superior Court of Burke County, case number 19-CVS-1276. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4298945), filed by Gaylor Electric, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Coversheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons, #4 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal in State Court)(Dellinger, Stephen) Modified duplicate text on 12/13/2019 (brj). |
| NOTICE: Case was filed in wrong division. Case has been copied from 3:19-cv-00684 to 1:19-cv-00346-MR. Please use 1:19-cv-00346-MR for all future pleadings. (brj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
