Bidou v. Saul
| Jennifer Bidou |
| Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2020cv00163 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Andrew M. Saul answer due 10/30/2020. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 8/21/2020. (ni)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (McWilliams, LaNita) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by LaNita McWilliams on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (McWilliams, LaNita) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew M. Saul, US Attorney, and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM-285s) (ni) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk is instructed to issue summons which shall be provided to USMS for service upon defendant. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/29/2020. (ni)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jennifer Bidou. (Hall, Charlotte) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Jennifer Bidou.(Hall, Charlotte) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
