Shook et al v. Monsanto Company
Plaintiff: Gerald Manley Shook, Jr. and Cheryl Marie Shook
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 1:2021cv00087
Filed: March 31, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Referring Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2021 Acknowledged receipt of electronically transferred case by USDC Northern District of California, their civil action no. 3:21-cv-03415. (rth)
May 3, 2021 Filing 5 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-267) of Judicial Panel MDL transferring case to Northern District of California, MDL# 2741. Matter transferred for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. (tmg)
May 3, 2021 Case electronically transferred to Northern District of California. Original electronic file and docket sheet sent. (tmg)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David A. Domina for Cheryl Marie Shook and Gerald Manley Shook, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF) Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 4/2/2021. (khm)
April 2, 2021 Notice to David A. Domina: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for ECF Account #Application Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 4/9/2021. (khm)
April 1, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to David A. Domina Filing fee $ 288, receipt number 0419-4967037. by Cheryl Marie Shook, Gerald Manley Shook, Jr. (Hensley, John). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
April 1, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Monsanto Company. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (rhf)
March 31, 2021 Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(rhf)
March 31, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0419-4965192), filed by Gerald Manley Shook, Jr, Cheryl Marie Shook.(Hensley, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shook et al v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerald Manley Shook, Jr.
Represented By: John C Hensley, Jr.
Represented By: David A. Domina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Marie Shook
Represented By: John C Hensley, Jr.
Represented By: David A. Domina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?