Bennett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Meiko Bennett
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Case Number: 1:2023cv00068
Filed: March 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2023 Filing 5 Administrative Record - Social Security, ANSWER to #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 part 2, #2 part 3, #3 part 4, #4 part 5, #5 part 6, #6 part 7, #7 part 8, #8 part 9, #9 part 10, #10 part 11, #11 part 12, #12 part 13, #13 part 14, #14 part 15)(McKay, Natasha)
May 12, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Natasha McKay on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (McKay, Natasha)
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/20/2023. (slm)
March 20, 2023 Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Rule 3; The Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. (slm)
March 20, 2023 Notice to answer Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on or by 60 days from the filing of this notice. (Commissioner of Social Security answer due 5/19/2023.) (slm)
March 14, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Meiko Bennett. (Arrowood, Derrick)
March 14, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Meiko Bennett.(Arrowood, Derrick)
March 14, 2023 Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meiko Bennett
Represented By: Derrick Kyle Arrowood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Natasha McKay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?