Gist v. United States Of America, et al
ANDREA NICOLE GIST |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICF, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration, John Does 1-5 and United States of America |
1:2024cv00141 |
May 9, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Airplane |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Wrongful Death |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Andrea Nicole Gist (Crouse, James) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to United States of America, United States Department Of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (cly) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (cly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America, United States Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, John Does 1-5 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6514930), filed by Andrea Nicole Gist. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Crouse, James) Modified on 5/13/2024 to change All Defendants to individually named parties, correct uppercase to lowercase, remove duplicative wording (cly). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.