Davis v. Western Carolina University et al
| James D. Davis |
| Western Carolina University and The University of North Carolina |
| 2:2014cv00006 |
| February 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Bryson City Office |
| Jackson |
| Dennis Howell |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER striking 36 Memorandum in Support of Motion. Plaintiff may file a brief which complies with the requirements of this Court within seven days of the entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/8/2015. (nv)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 29 Motion for Extension of Time and 30 Motion Rule 35 Mental Health Examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/9/2015. (nv)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting in part and denying as moot in part 24 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 2/10/2015. (nv)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 10 Amended Complaint. The University of North Carolina & Western Carolina University answer(s) due 6/23/2014; and denying as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/14/14. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER that the Court, at this time, will DECLINE to enter a Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan as requested by the parties in 9 Certification of Initial Attorneys Conference and Discovery Plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/7/14. (ejb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
