The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc. v. Bergh et al
Plaintiff: The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.
Defendant: William E. Bergh and M/Y Robin's Nest
Case Number: 3:2008cv00026
Filed: January 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Contract: Marine Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Carl Horn
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 46:31325 Preferred Mortgage Liens & Enforcement
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc. v. Bergh et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.
Represented By: Louis Graham Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William E. Bergh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M/Y Robin's Nest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?