Maruri v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Jessica Maruri
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2009cv00009
Filed: January 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 20 Motion for Attorney Fees Under EAJA in the amount of $5,223.13. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/10/11. (com)
December 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated December 1, 2010. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns.(gpb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maruri v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Maruri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?