Sellers v. H.G. Reynolds Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Sharod Sellers
Defendant: H.G. Reynolds Co., Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv00052
Filed: February 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Motor Vehicle Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: Graham Mullen
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER requiring parties to attend a telephone conference on May 12, 2010 at 10:30am. The parties are directed to assemble with each other via conference call and then call the Court at 704-350-7450. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 5/4/10. (chh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sellers v. H.G. Reynolds Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharod Sellers
Represented By: Clinton Jeff Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H.G. Reynolds Co., Inc.
Represented By: Ned A. Stiles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?