Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation v. Doddie V. Giles
Plaintiff: Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation
Defendant: Doddie V. Giles
Case Number: 3:2009cv00280
Filed: July 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Doddie V. Giles. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns (com)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation v. Doddie V. Giles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: John H. Culver, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doddie V. Giles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?