Boston v. Davis et al
Shirley Boston |
Pete Davis, Candi Benard and Jeanna Williams |
3:2011cv00450 |
September 15, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David S. Cayer |
Max O. Cogburn |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 6/7/2012. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns.. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/7/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf) |
Filing 23 ORDER denying without prejudice 10 Motion to Dismiss and 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; terminating 16 Memorandum and Recommendations; denying 18 Motion to Amend without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 3/8/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw) |
Filing 21 AMENDED ORDER amending 20 Order staying ruling on 16 Memorandum and Recommendations for 60 days as set forth in order. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 12/29/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Filing 20 ORDER staying ruling on 16 Memorandum and Recommendations for 60 days as set forth in order. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 12/28/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw) |
Filing 13 ORDER as to 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , 10 MOTION to Dismiss. (Responses due by 11/18/2011). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/19/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.