Chester v. US Security Associates
Plaintiff: Lakesha Shantay Chester
Defendant: US Security Associates
Case Number: 3:2012cv00204
Filed: March 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: XX, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER re 62 Bill of Costs. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/9/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
August 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER denying 60 Objection to Bill of Costs. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/28/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 54 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 8/6/2013. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Strike 40 Response to Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/12/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
June 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER LIFTING STAY, ( Jury Trial set for 9/3/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney.). Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/14/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
April 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER that the parties shall submit supplemental briefings no later than May 1, 2013.. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/2/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
March 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 33 Motion to Quash; granting 38 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/21/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
March 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER re: 35 Motion to Strike. The Court treats Plaintiff's Motion as a response to Defendant's 33 Motion to Quash. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/13/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) Modified on 3/13/2013, referred to David S. Cayer (tmg).
March 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying without prejudice as moot 31 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff to file response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment by 3/21/2013. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/7/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
November 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting 20 Motion to Strike 19 Miscellaneous Filing. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/19/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chester v. US Security Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakesha Shantay Chester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Security Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?