Russell v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc. et al
Norman Russell |
Steven R. Berrard, Michael J. Kipp and Swisher Hygiene, Inc. |
3:2012cv00216 |
April 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
Graham Mullen |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT (Filed in MDL Master 3:12-md-2384 as Doc. No. 104). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 8/6/2014. (tmg) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David Clarke, Jr for Michael J. Kipp. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/20/2012. (blf) |
Filing 36 ORDER granting 32 Motion to Stay. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/13/2012. (blf) |
Filing 22 ORDER for Amended consolidated complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 5/23/2012. (blf) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Consolidate Cases for Trial. All further pleadings to be electronically filed to: 3:12-cv-216 only. Member Case: 3:12-cv-221, 3:12-cv-256 to be administratively closed. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 5/18/2012. (blf) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting 14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jay B. Kasner for Steven R. Berrard, Michael J. Kipp, Swisher Hygiene, Inc.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 5/11/2012. (blf) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jeremy A. Lieberman for Norman Russell. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 05/07/2012. (blf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.