Long v. CPI Security Systems, Inc.
Petitioner: Darryl Long
Respondent: CPI Security Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv00396
Filed: June 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: XX, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER granting 104 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/26/2013. (tmg)
October 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER that the parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal in this case, or in the alternative request an extension of time to file such dismissal, on or before November 25, 2013.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/28/2013. (blf)
August 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER setting restrictions. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/13/2013. (blf)
July 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER denying 79 Motion for Leave to Appeal. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/15/2013. (blf)
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER denying 63 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 73 Memorandum and Recommendations.. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 5/17/2013. (blf)
March 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER granting 53 MOTION to Strike Declarations; MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Mika Elliott's clams be dismissed without prejudice and that 63 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Participate in Discovery filed by CPI Security Systems, Inc. be denied. ( Objections to M&R due by 4/8/2013). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/20/2013. (cbb)
November 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting 58 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Andrew G. Chase for Darryl Long. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/28/2012. (blf)
August 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER affirming 35 Memorandum and Recommendations.; dismissing as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss; denying 24 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/29/2012. (blf)
July 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 36 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/17/2012. (eef)
July 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 32 , 33 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Paul J. Lukas,Rachhana T. Srey for Darryl Long;. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/8/2012. (eef)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Long v. CPI Security Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darryl Long
Represented By: Paul Joseph Lukas
Represented By: Seth Ray Cohen
Represented By: Rachhana Thach Srey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CPI Security Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen D. Dellinger
Represented By: Joseph George Schmitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?