Otto Industries North America, Inc. v. The Phoenix Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Otto Industries North America, Inc.
Defendant: The Phoenix Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2012cv00717
Filed: October 30, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER denying as moot 54 Motion to Compel Appraisal And For Finding That Kevin Grudzien Is Not Impartial; granting 96 Motion to Withdraw 46 MOTION to Amend/Correct CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TO PERMIT AN AMENDMENT TO THE ANSWER TO ASSERT AN ADDITIONAL AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/20/2013. (eef)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER re 94 Case Settlement Notice. The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal in this case, or in the alternative request an extension of time to file such dismissal, on or before December 5, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/5/2013. (eef)
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER that Plaintiffs request for the discovery discussed during the telephone conference on August 12, 2013 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/13/2013. (eef)
August 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 35 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Allison K. Ferrini for The Phoenix Insurance Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/5/2013. (eef)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 32 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Kevin B. Dreher for Otto Industries North America, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/26/2013. (tmg)
May 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Compel; denying 27 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/14/2013. (eef)
January 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added James M. Hoey for The Phoenix Insurance Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/23/2013. (eef)
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Robert C. Deegan for Otto Industries North America, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/13/2012. (blf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Otto Industries North America, Inc. v. The Phoenix Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Otto Industries North America, Inc.
Represented By: John Shugrue
Represented By: Thomas A. Marrinson
Represented By: Jonathan C. Krisko
Represented By: Robert C. Deegan
Represented By: Brian Lee Church
Represented By: Louis Adams Bledsoe, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Phoenix Insurance Company
Represented By: Jon A. Berkelhammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?