PGI Polymer, Inc. et al v. 3M Company et al
PGI Polymer, Inc. and Polymer Group, Inc. |
3M Company and Target Corporation |
3:2015cv00212 |
May 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David S. Cayer |
Frank D. Whitney |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 ORDER granting 71 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jered Evan Matthysse for 3M Company and Target Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/16/16. (tob) |
Filing 41 ORDER granting 40 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Stephen Paul Meleen for 3M Company and Target Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/21/16. (tob) |
Filing 33 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/2/16. (tob) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Charles Marvin Landrum, III for AVINTIV Speciality Materials Inc. and for PGI Polymer, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/18/15. (tob) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Change Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/24/15. (tob) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting 14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added Travis Ryan Wimberly, Wendy Charisse Larson, William Gilbreth Barber for 3M Company & Target Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/08/2015. (jlk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.