Tompkins v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg School System
Angelina Tompkins |
Charlotte-Mecklenburg School System, Janet Moss and FNU Ferguson |
3:2016cv00152 |
March 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David S. Cayer |
Robert J. Conrad |
Civil Rights: Education |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Sanctions and Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff's counsel shall pay Defendant $784 in attorney's fees. Defendant's request for additional sanctions is denied. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 10/10/2019. (brl) |
Filing 56 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Oral Order entered in open Court on 5/7/2019. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (brl) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 18 Memorandum and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/15/2016. (tmg) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by FNU Ferguson, Janet Moss, Charlotte-Mecklenburg School System ( Objections to M&R due by 10/24/2016) and ORDER that the deadline for perfecting service of process on the Defendants is extended through November 7, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/6/16. (tob) |
Filing 14 ORDER following briefing of 7 MOTION to Dismiss . The parties shall file supplemental briefs on or before 9/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/1/16. (tob) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.