Eschert v. City of Charlotte
| Crystal Eschert |
| City of Charlotte |
| 3:2016cv00295 |
| June 6, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
AMENDED JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/1/17. (clc)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 105 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Motion for New Trial. The Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is denied in its entirety, the alternative Motion for a New Trial ou tright is denied; however, the Court grants a new trial nisi remittitur. Plaintiff shall agree to remit damages as stated in order by filing a document no later than 8/30/17, indicating that she agrees to the remittitur. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in the Court granting a new trial on the issue of damages. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/23/2017. (tmg) (Main Document 124 replaced on 8/23/2017) (tmg).
|
|
Filing
93
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Jury's Verdict dated 5/11/17. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (clc)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER and Notice of Hearing that a final pretrial conference in this matter will take place before the undersigned at docket call on Monday, May 1, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1-1 of the Charles R. Jonas Federal Building, 401 West Trade Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/6/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER regarding in-camera review of discovery documents. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/30/17. (clc)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER regarding discovery dispute re Telephone Conference held on 3/27/17. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/28/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying without prejudice 16 Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Plaintiff's Subpoenas Duces Tecum. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/17/16. (mga)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting with modification 14 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to First Set Of Interrogatories And Request for Production of Documents. Defendant shall have up to and including November 14, 2016 to provide responses to Plaintiff's discovery requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/14/16. (mga)
|
|
Filing
11
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/29/16. (mga)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eschert v. City of Charlotte | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Crystal Eschert | |
| Represented By: | Margaret (Meg) Behringer Maloney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Charlotte | |
| Represented By: | Lori R. Keeton |
| Represented By: | Sara R. Lincoln |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
