Castro v. Stanton Enterprise, Inc. et al
| Miriam Maya Castro |
| Stanton Enterprise, Inc., Jeff Stanton and Ann Stanton |
| 3:2016cv00830 |
| December 6, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Gaston |
| David S. Cayer |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
AMENDED ORDER re 56 Consent Judgment. Judgment is hereby entered against Defendants Stanton Enterprise, Inc., Jeff Stanton, and Ann Stanton and in favor of Plaintiff for the total sum of $5,075.64, plus prejudgment i nterest and reasonable attorneys fees; FURTHER ORDERED that Any remaining claims raised in this litigation, including those against McDonalds Corporation and McDonalds USA, LLC, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/15/2018. (eef)
|
|
Filing
56
CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Miriam Maya Castro against McDonald's Corporation, McDonald's U.S.A., LLC, Stanton Enterprise, Inc., Ann Stanton, Jeff Stanton. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 1/5/2018. (eef)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 43 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Elizabeth B. McRee for McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's U.S.A., LLC; granting 44 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Alice V. Brathwaite for McDonald's Corporation and for McDonald's U.S.A., LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/22/17. (tob)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
