Patterson v. Non-Profit Industries
| Wanda M Patterson |
| Non-Profit Industries |
| 3:2016cv00845 |
| December 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David Keesler |
| Max O. Cogburn |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER Granting 21 Plaintiff's Motion For Voluntary Dismissal. This Action is Dismissed Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 2/23/2018. (jaw)
|
|
Filing
16
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/14/17. (mga)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patterson v. Non-Profit Industries | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wanda M Patterson | |
| Represented By: | Michael Harman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Non-Profit Industries | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
