Clayton v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company N.A. et al
| Wellesley K. Clayton |
| Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company N.A., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Satterfield Legal PLLC |
| 3:2017cv00245 |
| May 8, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Graham Mullen |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 9/21/2017. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jaw)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/21/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jaw)
|
|
Filing
5
Amended ORDER re 4 Order to Serve Defendants, is Stayed Pending the Results of the IFP Motion. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 05/09/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bar)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER that the Plaintiffs complaint for temporary restraining order without notice is DENIED; Further Ordered that this is immediately converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and the Plaintiff is required to serve notice on the Defendants Bank of New York Mellon Trust company N.A., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, and Satterfield Legal PLLC.Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 5/8/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jaw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
