Fuller v. Ingram et al
| Bruce S. Fuller |
| Kevin Ingram, FNU Aaron, Jerlines Bennett, FNU Herring, FNU Rogers, Ed Gazo, FNU Jackson and FNU Baker |
| 3:2017cv00443 |
| July 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Anson |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 3/21/19. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that The Amended Complaint survives initial review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 against Defendants Baker and Smith for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need; against Defendants Ingram and Holden for the use o f excessive force; against Defendant Ingram for unconstitutional conditions of confinement; and against Defendant Ingram for retaliation.(2) The remaining claims are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).Plaintiffs Letters, (Doc. N os. 15, 16), are construed as motions for the appointment of counsel and are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Clerk of Court shall commence the procedure for waiver of service as set forth in Local Rule 4.3 for Defendants Baker, Holden, Ingram, and Smith who are current or former employees of NC DPS.Signed: September. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/28/18. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
