Seitz v. U.S. National Whitewater Center, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: James Seitz
Defendant: U.S. National Whitewater Center, Inc. and Recreation Engineering And Planning, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv00044
Filed: January 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: XX, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Max O. Cogburn
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting 69 Motion to Modify the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan. Discovery extended to 6/14/2019. Motions extended to 7/1/2019. Defendants' Expert Report deadline is extended to 4/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/11/19. (tob)
June 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER denying 53 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/12/18. (mga)
May 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 59 STIPULATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/24/18. (mga)
February 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 35 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Mary Barley-McBride for Recreation Engineering And Planning, Inc.; granting 36 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Richard Silk, Jr for Recreation Engineering And Planning, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 02/09/2018. (brl)
February 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; granting 23 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/2/2018. (ams)
January 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 1/26/2018. (ds)[Transferred from Ohio Southern on 1/26/2018.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seitz v. U.S. National Whitewater Center, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Seitz
Represented By: Edward G. Connette
Represented By: John Thompson Daniel
Represented By: Jose M. Lopez
Represented By: Jonathan S. Zweizig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. National Whitewater Center, Inc.
Represented By: John Huddleston Beyer
Represented By: Harold D. Holmes, Jr.
Represented By: Morgan Hunter Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Recreation Engineering And Planning, Inc.
Represented By: Mary Barley-McBride
Represented By: Joseph Lawrence Nelson
Represented By: Richard J. Silk, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?