Tabak v. LPM Media Group, Inc.
| Alec Tabak |
| LPM Media Group, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv00393 |
| July 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| XX, Outside District |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPORT on the filing or determination of a copyright action regarding copyright numbers VA-2-013-887. (jaw) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Alec Tabak (Hudson, Seth) |
| NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 5 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 9/10/2018. (jaw) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LPM Media Group, Inc. (Nipp, John) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by LPM Media Group, Inc..(Nipp, John) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of a copyright action regarding copyright number VA-2-013-887. (ams) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to LPM Media Group, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ams) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LPM Media Group, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-3751592), filed by Alec Tabak. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Pop-Out Boys Photograph, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Registration, #3 Exhibit C - LPM Article, #4 Exhibit D - Social Media Article)(Hudson, Seth) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ams) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tabak v. LPM Media Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LPM Media Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John C. Nipp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alec Tabak | |
| Represented By: | Seth Lee Hudson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
