Platinum Press, Inc. v. Douros-Hawk
Plaintiff: Platinum Press, Inc.
Defendant: Danielle Douros-Hawk
Case Number: 3:2018cv00458
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Chen Kilpatrick on behalf of Danielle Douros-Hawk (Kilpatrick, Thomas)
October 4, 2018 Filing 9 Danielle Douros ANSWER to #1 Complaint motions to dismiss Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Danielle Douros-Hawk.(Kilpatrick, Thomas)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Danielle Douros-Hawk is granted an extension of time up through and including October 4, 2018, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Entered by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/18/2018. (STB)
September 13, 2018 Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Danielle Douros-Hawk. (Cherry, William)
September 13, 2018 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Platinum Press, Inc.. Replies due by 9/20/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Parsons, Kevin)
September 12, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Danielle Douros-Hawk. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cherry, William)
September 12, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Sutton Cherry, III on behalf of Danielle Douros-Hawk (Cherry, William)
August 27, 2018 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Platinum Press, Inc.. Danielle Douros-Hawk served on 8/23/2018, answer due 9/13/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Parsons, Kevin)
August 21, 2018 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Platinum Press, Inc. (Hinson, Philip)
August 21, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Danielle Douros-Hawk. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (brl)
August 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Danielle Douros-Hawk with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-3783618), filed by Platinum Press, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Parsons, Kevin)
August 21, 2018 Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Platinum Press, Inc. v. Douros-Hawk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Platinum Press, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin V. Parsons
Represented By: Philip Andrew Hinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danielle Douros-Hawk
Represented By: Thomas Chen Kilpatrick
Represented By: William Sutton Cherry, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?