Davis v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
| Katrina Davis |
| Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Lincoln National Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company |
| 3:2019cv00384 |
| August 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #5 MOTION to Dismiss , #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Response due on or before 10/9/2019. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 10/3/2019. (ams)
|
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss , #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court MOTION for Attorney Fees by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Lincoln National Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company. (Gray, Deven) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss , #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court MOTION for Attorney Fees by Katrina Davis. Replies due by 10/2/2019 (Matesic, Rachel) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss , #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court MOTION for Attorney Fees by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Lincoln National Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company. Responses due by 10/2/2019 (Gray, Deven) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss , #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court MOTION for Attorney Fees by Katrina Davis. Replies due by 9/18/2019 (Matesic, Rachel) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court , MOTION for Attorney Fees by Katrina Davis. Responses due by 9/25/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A, Correspondence)(Matesic, Rachel) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #5 MOTION to Dismiss . Response due by 9/11/2019. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 9/4/2019. (ams)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Katrina Davis. Responses due by 9/3/2019 (Matesic, Rachel) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Lincoln National Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Wells Fargo Short Term Disability Plan)(Gray, Deven) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Lincoln National Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company. Responses due by 8/28/2019 (Gray, Deven) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lincoln National Corporation (Gray, Deven) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (Gray, Deven) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wells Fargo And Company (Gray, Deven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg County Superior Court, case number 19-CVS-12090. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4128247), filed by Lincoln National Corporation, Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Wells Fargo And Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Notice of Removal, #3 Cover Sheet)(Gray, Deven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
