Oates v. Saul
Plaintiff: Stacy Nelson Oates
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 3:2019cv00448
Filed: September 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Referring Judge: Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney served on 10/4/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. (ctb)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Andrew A. Flemming is hereby admitted pro hac to represent Plaintiff Stacy Nelson Oates. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/15/19. (mga)
October 15, 2019 Notice to Andrew A. Flemming: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for ECF at #www.ncwd.uscourts.gov. Deadline by 10/22/2019. (mga)
October 14, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Andrew A. Flemming Filing fee $ 281, receipt number 0419-4219014. by Stacy Nelson Oates. (Bowling, Russell). Motions referred to David Keesler.
October 7, 2019 TEXT-ONLY Order of Referral - Social Security. Pursuant to the Standing Order 3:13MC95, 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 72.1 this case is referred to a United States Magistrate Judge to make findings of fact, conclusions of law and to recommend disposition of any dispositive motion filed through submission of a Memorandum and Recommendation to the District Judge. Case referred to Magistrate Judge David Keesler (ctb)
October 2, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew M. Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Forms)(ctb)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 10/02/2019. (ctb)
September 12, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stacy Nelson Oates. (Bowling, Russell)
September 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Stacy Nelson Oates. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bowling, Russell)
September 12, 2019 Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oates v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Nelson Oates
Represented By: Russell R. Bowling
Represented By: Andrew A. Flemming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?