Dixon v. Saul
Michael Andre Dixon |
Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul |
3:2019cv00610 |
November 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Martin Reidinger |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USM as to Andrew Saul, US Attorney General served on 11/26/2019. (rys) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USM as to Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security served on 11/22/2019. (rys) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USM as to US Attorney, served on 11/19/2019, answer due 1/21/2020. (rys) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew M. Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (ctb) (Attachments: #1 USM285 Form) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Upon receipt of the summons, the Clerk shall deliver process to the United States Marshal for service. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 11/15/2019. (ctb) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Andre Dixon. (Bowling, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Michael Andre Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bowling, Russell) |
Case assigned to District Judge Martin Reidinger. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.