Russell v. University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Plaintiff: David Russell
Defendant: University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Case Number: 3:2020cv00172
Filed: March 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint by University of North Carolina at Charlotte. (Totten, Vanessa)
May 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint by University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Responses due by 6/1/2020 (Totten, Vanessa)
April 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Vanessa Noel Totten on behalf of University of North Carolina at Charlotte (Totten, Vanessa)
April 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against University of North Carolina at Charlotte, filed by David Russell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Charge, #2 Exhibit B - NRTS)(Angel, Kirk) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/10/2020) (mga). NEF regenerated on 4/10/2020 (mga).
April 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by David Russell. University of North Carolina at Charlotte waiver sent on 3/19/2020, answer due 5/18/2020. (Angel, Kirk)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to James S. Humphrey IV - Registered Agent on 3/19/2020 by David Russell. (Angel, Kirk)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against University of North Carolina at Charlotte with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4430915), filed by David Russell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Charge, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Right to Sue)(Angel, Kirk) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/19/2020) (mga). (Attachment 2 replaced on 3/19/2020) (mga).
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (brj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Russell v. University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Represented By: Vanessa Noel Totten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Russell
Represented By: Kirk J. Angel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?