Benson et al v. Fort Mill Schools / York County District 4 et al
Alexis Benson and Kevin Carberry, Sr |
Fort Mill Schools / York County District 4, South Carolina Board of Education and Molly Spearman |
3:2022cv00154 |
April 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
David S Cayer |
Robert J Conrad |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disability Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 5/4/2022. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl) |
Filing 3 ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 1] is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is instructed to terminate this action. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 5/4/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl) |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alexis Benson, Kevin Carberry, Sr. (js) |
Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Alexis Benson, Kevin Carberry, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons)(js) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.