Dekattu v. McFadden
| Ngomani Dekattu |
| Gary McFadden |
| USA2255Group |
| 3:2022cv00350 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Thomas D Schroeder |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 FOURTH CIRCUIT'S NOTICE of Designation of Honorable Thomas D. Schroeder, United States Chief Judge for the District for the Middle District of North Carolina, to hold a district court in the Western District of North Carolina in the cases stated herein, for such time as needed in advance to prepare and thereafter as required to complete unfinished business in the matter in the case of US v. Dekattu, No. 3:22-cr-00073, Dekattu v. McFadden, No. 3:22-cv-00350, and Dekattu v. Burnette, et al., No. 3:22-cv-00265. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh) |
| Case reassigned to District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder. District Judge Frank D. Whitney no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(thh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ngomani Dekattu. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ef) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Ngomani Dekattu. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
