Reddicks v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Arianna Reddicks
Defendant: Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Case Number: 3:2022cv00438
Filed: August 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Robert J Conrad
2 Judge: David Keesler
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2022 Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Magistrate Judge David Keesler no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER of Administrative Close Out of Member Cases. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 9/12/2022. (brl)
September 2, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Sally Wiest Bryan on behalf of Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme (Bryan, Sally)
September 2, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Dino S. Sangiamo on behalf of Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme (Sangiamo, Dino)
August 30, 2022 NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 10/11/2022 11:00 AM in Courtroom #8, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before District Judge Robert J. Conrad Jr. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 FIRST PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/9/22. (rth)
August 24, 2022 Filing 14 Case transferred in from District of Oregon; Case Number 6:22-cv-00881. Original electronic file and docket sheet received.
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Pursuant to MDL 3034, Docket No. 110. Certified on 8/24/2022 by Deputy Clerk Robin Holiday of the Western District of North Carolina. (dsg) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
August 24, 2022 Filing 12 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-4) finalized on 8/24/2022. As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 8/24/2022. (dsg) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
August 24, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(rth)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time #10 . All deadlines extended 60 days to allow the case to be transferred to Judge Conrad in the Western District of North Carolina as part of MDL No. 3036. Answer is due by 10/11/2022. Discovery is to be completed by 12/19/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/17/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 1/17/2023. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
August 10, 2022 Filing 10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time and Notice of MDL. Filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Campanella, Dominic) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 . Answer is due by 8/10/2022. Plaintiff's opposition to motion to dismiss (if necessary) will be due 9/16/2022 with a reply (if necessary ) due 9/30/2022. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
July 28, 2022 Filing 8 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Filed by All Defendants. (Campanella, Dominic) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
July 27, 2022 Filing 7 Notice of Appearance of Dominic M. Campanella appearing on behalf of All Defendants . Filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Campanella, Dominic) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
June 17, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
June 17, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Merck & Co., Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael J. McShane and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 10/17/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/14/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 11/14/2022. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (bd) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
June 17, 2022 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint #1 . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (DeShaw, Aaron) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
June 16, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons to Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. and Defendant Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (DeShaw, Aaron) Modified on 6/17/2022 to correct docket text. NEF not regenerated. (bd) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]
June 16, 2022 Filing 1 First Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8556316 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by ARIANNA REDDICKS against All Defendants. (DeShaw, Aaron) [Transferred from Oregon on 8/24/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reddicks v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arianna Reddicks
Represented By: Aaron C. DeShaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck & Co, Inc.
Represented By: Dominic M. Campanella
Represented By: Dino S. Sangiamo
Represented By: Sally Wiest Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme
Represented By: Dominic M. Campanella
Represented By: Dino S. Sangiamo
Represented By: Sally Wiest Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?