Boyd v. Truist Bank
Marshall Boyd |
Truist Bank |
3:2024cv00583 |
June 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
David Keesler |
Frank D Whitney |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Marshall Boyd (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting Defendant's #9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Truist Bank answer due 8/21/2024. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/29/24. (mga) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Truist Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Springer, Brandon). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Truist Bank. (Springer, Brandon) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon C.E. Springer on behalf of Truist Bank (Springer, Brandon) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jeffrey M. Ostrow for Marshall Boyd. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/25/24. (mga) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Jeff Ostrow Filing fee $ 300, receipt number ANCWDC-6603552. by Marshall Boyd. (Harris, Scott). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marshall Boyd. Truist Bank served on 7/11/2024, answer due 8/1/2024. (Harris, Scott) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Truist Bank. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (add) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement of Citizenship of Party or Intervenor by Marshall Boyd. (Harris, Scott) |
Filing 1 Class Action COMPLAINT against Truist Bank with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6566294), filed by Marshall Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Harris, Scott) Modified text on 7/17/2024 (rth). |
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (add) |
Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(add) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boyd v. Truist Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Truist Bank | |
Represented By: | Brandon C.E. Springer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marshall Boyd | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Ostrow |
Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Ostrow |
Represented By: | Scott C. Harris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.