Abrams-Kelly et al v. Department of Treasury et al
| Nicole Abrams-Kelly and Global Existence Foundation |
| Thomas J. Marshall, NC State Treasurer's Office- Legal, U.S. Veterans Affairs Department, Veterans Affairs- NAVY, North Carolina Department of Revenue, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Treasury and North Carolina Veterans Affairs |
| 3:2024cv01131 |
| December 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nicole Abrams-Kelly. (add) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Treasury, Thomas J. Marshall, NC State Treasurer's Office- Legal, North Carolina Department of Revenue, North Carolina Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Veterans Affairs Department, Veterans Affairs- NAVY, filed by Nicole Abrams-Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Subpoenas)(add) |
| Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Litigants in Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(add) |
| Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence (3:24-mc-104). Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order (add) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
