Pitts v. McClanahan et al
| Clarence Michael Pitts |
| Paul A. McClanahan and Michael Lee |
| 5:2011cv00154 |
| October 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Iredell |
| David S. Cayer |
| Richard Voorhees |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER recommending that 11 Dfts' MOTION to Show Cause and MOTION to Dismiss be denied. ( Objections to M&R due by 8/13/2012), ORDER that plf's counsel pay dfts. their reasonabl e attorneys' fees incurred in preparing 11 Motion and the related briefs. Dfts' counsel shall prepare and submit to the Court a detailed statement of attorneys' fees incurred. After reviewing the statement, the Court will award dfts ' their reasonable attorneys' fees. Plaintiff is to provide within 14 days of the date of this Order full and complete responses to discovery requests listed in this order and disclose his experts and produce any reports from expert witnesses. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/26/12. (smj)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Compel. Within 15 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plf shall provide full and complete responses to dfts' 1st Interrogs and 1st Req/Prod/Dcmts and disclose his experts and produce reports from expert witnesses. Parties shall bear their own costs at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 4/25/2012. (cbb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
