Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Titeflex Corporation

Defendant: Titeflex Corporation
Plaintiff: Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2012cv00023
Filed: February 21, 2012
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Office: Statesville Office
County: Watauga
Referring Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Richard Voorhees
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 14, 2012 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; added Daniel Bowman White for Titeflex Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 6/13/12. (smj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Titeflex Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Titeflex Corporation
Represented By: James M. Dedman, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Represented By: F. Douglas Banks
Represented By: Jeremy Lynn Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?